PERBEDAAN KUALITAS TANAMAN MINT (Mentha spicata L) HIDROPONIK DAN KONVENSIONAL BERDASARKAN MORFOLOGI TANAMAN, PROFIL KROMATOGRAM, DAN KADAR MINYAK ATSIRI

  • Pramita Yuli Pratiwi Politeknik Kesehatan Bhakti Setya Indonesia Yogyakarta
  • Ana Mardiyaningsih Politeknik Kesehatan Bhakti Setya Indonesia
  • Emi Widarti Rumah Sakit Mardi Waluyo Metro Lampung
Keywords: Mentha spicata L, essential oil, hydroponic

Abstract

Mint is one of the essential oil-producing plants. Essential oils of Mentha spicata L or spearmint are widely used as raw materials in the food, beverage and pharmaceutical preparations industries. The main components of spearmint are karvon, limonen, cineol, dihydrocarvol, myrcene, and 0.5% menthol. The components contained in spearmint have properties as herbal remedies. Plant cultivation greatly determined the results of standardized drug ingredients. Cultivation with the right planting system can affect the quality of simplicia. This research were a descriptive study to differentiate the quality of plants. This study aimed to determine differences in plant morphology, chromatogram profile and levels of spearmint essential oil between hydroponic and conventional planting systems. Observation of plant morphology includes the size, color of the stem and leaves. Essential oil content is calculated from refined oil by steam and water distillation method. Spearmint oil was analyzed on thin layer chromatography methode using the silica gel F254as a stationary phase and hexane-ethyl acetate (8: 2) as a mobile phase, with spot visualization under UV254 and anisaldehyde-H2SO4 . The results showed that the morphology of Mentha spicata L with hydrophonic  planting systems had a bigger size in stem and leaves, but the leaves had more bright green than a conventional plant. The chromatogram profile did not show differences in the number of spots and Rf. Mentha spicata L with conventional planting systems had a sharper intensity of color on one of the volatile oil spot, and suggested  due to menthol. The levels volatile oil of Mentha spicata L hydroponic and conventional were determined as 0.0326% and 0.0323% . The Independent T-test analysis  showed that there were not a significant differences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alviani, P. (2016) Bertanam Hidroponik Untuk Pemula. (2nd edition). Jawa Barat: Bibit Publisher Depok.

Ihsan. (2016). Penyebab daun kuning tanaman hidroponik dan solusinya. Urban Hidroponik. diakses dari Http://www.Urbanhidroponik.com/2016/04/penyebab-daun-kuning-tanaman-hidroponik-dan-solusinya.html

Lawrence, B. M. (2006). Mint The Genus Mentha. United States: CRC Press.

Michael W, Pelter. (2008). Analysis of Peppermint Leaf and Spearmint Leaf Extracts by Thin-Layer Chromatography, Department of Chemistry and Physics, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond.

Pracaya. (2007). Hama dan Penyakit Tanaman. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.

Roslani, R. P. (2016). Lahan pertanian di Indonesia hanya 33 persen. diakses dari https://www.viva.co.id/arsip/853182-lahan-pertanian-di-indonesia-hanya-33-persen

Roidah, I.,S., (2014). Pemanfaatan Lahan Dengan Menggunakan Sistem Hidroponik. Jurnal Universitas Tulungagung Bonorowo.Vol 1 No.2 : 43-48

Sastrohamidjojo, H. (2004). Kimia Minyak Atsiri. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada Press.

Sgherri, C. (2010). Antioxidant activity and nutraceuticals in basil Ocimum basilicum cv grown in hydroponics and soil, Food Chemistry: 123(2):416-422

Stahl, E., (1985) Analisis Obat Secara Kromatografi dan Mikroskopi. Bandung: ITB Press.

Tjitrosoepomo, G. (1989). Morfologi Tumbuhan. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Wagner. H.,Bladt. S., and Zgainski, E.M. (1984). Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Cromatography Atlas (Th. A. Scoot Springer Verlag, Trans). Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo.
Published
2019-05-24
How to Cite
Pratiwi, P., Mardiyaningsih, A., & Widarti, E. (2019). PERBEDAAN KUALITAS TANAMAN MINT (Mentha spicata L) HIDROPONIK DAN KONVENSIONAL BERDASARKAN MORFOLOGI TANAMAN, PROFIL KROMATOGRAM, DAN KADAR MINYAK ATSIRI. Jurnal Riset Kefarmasian Indonesia, 1(2), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.33759/jrki.v1i2.18
Views Statistic
  • Abstract 89
  • PDF 88